Launched in late 2022, ChatGPT currently boasts approximately 180.5 million users, with the website garnering a substantial 1.5 billion visits in September 2023. Entrepreneurs are leveraging its capabilities to secure press coverage, expand their audience, and enhance productivity. It comes as no surprise that many are utilizing the platform for various content creation purposes, including blogs, articles, LinkedIn posts, tweets, and emails.
In the evolving landscape of AI comment generators and article-writing tools, the prevalence of AI-generated content is on the rise. While not inherently inferior, distinguishing AI-generated content is crucial.
How To Identify ChatGPT Generated Content
Long Introductions
ChatGPT demonstrates a tendency for illustrative introductions, reminiscent of journalistic “throat clearing,” delving into potentially unnecessary context before addressing the core content. This characteristic often manifests with clichéd or metaphorical language, serving as an immediate indicator of AI-generated content.
Ethical Considerations
A distinctive trait of ChatGPT’s output is the inclusion of ethical considerations towards the conclusion of generated content. Irrespective of the subject matter, whether it’s recruitment, law, or advice on selecting a nail technician, ChatGPT consistently emphasizes the importance of ethical considerations, acting as a conspicuous giveaway.
Generic Thoughts and Advice
Reflecting its extensive training on diverse internet content, ChatGPT tends to offer generic advice, avoiding strong opinions. Its perspective is an amalgamation of numerous viewpoints, leading to a balanced approach that may appear generic to inexperienced users. This inclination toward neutrality becomes apparent in the content it produces.
Lack of Personal Stories
Unlike human writers who often incorporate personal anecdotes and references to real experiences, ChatGPT typically lacks this personal touch. Unless prompted, it does not naturally include quirky stories, company references, or lessons learned from personal observations. The absence of such elements signals that a human likely did not craft the content.
Use Of Certain Phrases
ChatGPT occasionally resorts to generic or flowery language, resembling the approach of someone navigating an unfamiliar topic in an exam. Phrases like “unleash” and “buckle up” are among its favourites. Detecting these recurring phrases in content provides a reliable indication that ChatGPT may be the author.
Signature Structure
Recognizable by its consistent structure, ChatGPT typically organizes articles into 5 or 6 sections, including an introduction, scene-setting, actionable sections, additional considerations, a summary, and ethical reflections. This structured approach, coupled with occasional bizarre metaphors, is a hallmark found extensively across AI-generated content. New writers using ChatGPT should be cautious not to inadvertently adopt this default structure, and the presence of such a framework should raise suspicion for those scrutinizing content origins.
As I conclude, the advent of ChatGPT is not adverse in every sense, however, the over-reliance of artificial intelligence will result in mental lethargy, inhibiting creativity and frustrate the virtues of hard work and stiffening originality.
I believe ChatGPT should serve as a guide not an author of articles, and should remain a tool rather than a substitute for human creativity.